Bradley Arms BAR15/22
Pete Moore tests what he considers to be the best 22 rimfire AR15-u-like to date, in the form of the Bradley Arms BAR15/22 semi-auto rifle
The loss of self-loading centrefire rifles back in 1988 was a severe blow to me; as I just loved those military guns. In fact having to go back to a bolt-action took the shine off Practical Rifle (PR) and it was not until the appearance of the straight-pull AR15s that I bothered to look at the discipline again.
In the end I settled on an SGC Speedmaster (great rifle) and some of the fun of the event returned, but even then having to yank that handle for every shot was not 100% satisfying; but beggars can’t be choosers… However, there was and is a way to own a self-loader of this type and that’s as a 22 rimfire and these days there are a plethora of guns to satisfy what seems to becoming an ever growing demand.
Drop-in centre
The original idea was a drop-in blow back kit that replaced the 223 bolt with a chamber insert system and dedicated magazine; best typified by the Atchison and Ceiner conversion kits. Good idea but not really that reliable as I was to discover. Next came dedicated 22 uppers that used a proper 22 LR barrel with the back half of the rimfire kit, which worked much better. Which by and large is what we have today in various shapes and forms.
For me a 22 semi has to offer two things, which are of equal importance – accuracy and reliability, as one is useless without the other. This is why I no longer hunt rabbits with a semi as I do not find them reliable enough. Likewise over the years I have tested many 22, military-style self loaders and none have come fully up to my expectations. They all seem to start off OK then after 200-300-rounds get problematic; if not down right jam-a-matic. So when I am offered one of this marque to test I tend to approach it with deal of scepticism.
With that in mind let’s turn our attention to Mark Bradley (Bradley Arms). Mark is an expierenced and long term PR, Service and High Power shooter. However, a few years ago he decided to get into gunsmithing, initially concentrating on AR15s then branching out into anything and everything. I have tested samples of his work and have no complaints, so when he asked me if I would like to look at a dedicated 22 AR I was intrigued.
1000 and counting
The BAR 15/22 is very much a movable feast as are all AR15s no matter the calibre, as there are so many accessories available you can have what you like – CAR15, M4, A2 full length military, iron or optically sighted. The basic rifle Mark offers shows a 16”, stainless Douglas XX tube with match chamber, M16 flash hider, 4-Way, Free-float forend with standard furniture and flat top action. He now has his own upper and lower receivers made, so it is pretty autonomous.
The test gun also showed a Magpul pistol grip and telescopic stock and fold-down iron sights – all very nice! Though he can offer any barrel length you like Mark reckons that 16” is about right for most needs and I would have to agree.
I picked up the rifle along with 4 x 24-round Black dog magazines and felt that old and familiar AR15 thrill, as there’s no doubt it’s a good looking piece… All Mark said was that he had put 1000-rounds through it with no real problems and to have fun. Well I was hoping for the latter but not sure if the former round count would allow it!
Ammo up
First job was finding the right ammo, as 22 semis can be fussy. I dug out a cross section of SK, Lapua, Winchester and Remington subsonics, standard and high velocity. To my pleasure they all worked, cycling the action easily. The only thing it did not like was some ultra HV Viper. Getting critical I found the SK, High Velocity hollow point to be the most accurate, cutting an easy ½” @ 50-yards.
Reliability testing was done with Lapua Magazine 22, as I had a lot of that ‘ammo in a tin’ on hand. Loading the Black Dog mags to 24-rounds I just kept running them through the gun re-filling and it kept shooting. I reckon I put over 700-rounds through the 15/22 in the course of my testing. In that time I only had one stoppage and that was an under powered round that ejected, re-chambered the next one but failed to cock the hammer. Also pleasing was at no time did I get a firing out of battery (round goes off before the bolt is fully closed) that I have come to associate with 22 AR semis.
So well did the SK HV shoot that at 100-yards it was holding an inch, which is not far off what my 17HMR Ruger M77/17 can do. OK it did not shoot as flat as it dropped 3 ½”, or one Mil-Dot, but it was spot on and pretty consistent too. Which as we shall see led me on to other experimentation!
Know your way around
In terms of layout the 15/22 is pure AR with all the features; T-handle, forward assist, case deflector, ejection port cover. Typical of this build the blow back bolt assembly does not allow the use of the forward assist plunger nor the auto bolt hold open/release catch. However, the Black Dog magazines do incorporate a primitive hold open function as when empty the extended follower protrudes into the bolt way and stops it closing. Better than nothing…
The trigger was typical AR being firm but reasonably crisp, so good enough for most uses, but if you want more then it can be added to the spec. For me as a fun gun the 15/22 came over as reliable and very accurate and I had a lot of fun just turning live into empty on small, frangible targets. Without doubt this rifle would satisfy my needs for a military, look-a-like self loader and Action rifle; but there’s more.
My initial outing so impressed me with the gun’s ability that I decided to take it rabbiting. OK hold on, many of you know my views on military-type rifles out in the field as to the look of the thing and the potential PR problems they might cause. But I just had to see what it could do on live targets, plus my shooting area is all private land and I picked a spot well off the beaten track. Call me a hypocrite and I accept that; but the BAR 15/22 was just begging to bash some bunnies.
Bunny buster
I fitted it up with a Night Force 2.5-10x24 with illuminated Mil-Dot reticule and up front went an Ase Utra Jet-Z CQB 223 moddy. The reason I used this was simple - the rifle comes threaded 1/2x28” UNEF for the flash hider, so none of my 1/2x20” UNF rimfire cans would fit. For a gun lamp I used a Sure Fire M16 pistol grip light that clamped under the forend. Zeroed at 60-yards fall of shot at 100-yards was 3.5” or one Mil-Dot near as to make no difference, this I set as my maximum range. You can if you like ask for the UNF thread to be cut instead of the finer one. For me I’d keep it 1/2x28 as Jager Sporting Arms offer their new 17/22 Switch rimfire can in this thread form, which is a neat, little reflex-type option.
The evening went very well as I rolled over two rabbits and three hares; all head shots with the best being a big hare at 89-yards – not bad for a 22 rimfire! As a confirmed bolt gunner the reliability of the 15/22 and its self-loading mech was a revelation for me and also a pleasure. For this use I have one niggle and that’s the 24-shot mag, as it’s too long and tends to bash on the door of the truck and requires more clearance underneath if shooting off a rest. Mark told me he has sourced a 15-shot unit that is the length of the old, 223, 20-rounder.
At the end of the day this is one great little rifle that combines it all, if you like that sort of thing – fun, accuracy, reliability, hi-capacity and that all important AR15 look. I am definitely getting one when finances allow. Prices vary given your build requirements, but the basic rifle starts around £1150, this particular example would cost £1500.
We Reckon:
• Very reliable 22 semi-auto
• Highly accurate
• Great fun, great shooter
| Technical Specifications | |
|---|---|
| Name | Bradley Arms BAR 15/22 |
| Calibre | 22 Long Rifle |
| Action | blow back semi-auto |
| Capacity | 24 (DM) |
| Barrel | 16” 4-Way, free-float forend |
| Flat top action | Y |
| Iron sights | optional |
| Price | £1150 |
All Prices Are Guides Due to the Changes in US & European Exchange Rates





Thanks for a good read, Pete. Nice to see these available as .22 for people just starting out again...!
Comment by: Terry Beddington Posted on: 10 Feb 2010 at 07:22 PM
Terry
Yes the 22 military look-a-likes have really taken off, check out this month's Shooting Sports as I'm testing NWCP's new Smith & Wesson M&P15;/22.
I have spoken to Mark and he told me that the barrels are being made by Border Barrels as we speak, so hopefully he should be in position to start producing more in the near future. Don't you just hate waiting for things, I know I do...
PM
Comment by: pete moore Posted on: 11 Feb 2010 at 04:00 PM
It should be noted that this weapon costs £1150. If you are just after a 'tactical looking' .22 rifle, this compares poorly to the Colt .22 tactical rimfire and the offering from S&W M&P, both of which are under $600, to the GSG5 which retails at under £600 and to the Ruger 522 at around the same price. From what I can gather, the Colt is all metal, wheras the S&W has polymer upper, lower and forend. The GSG is all metal and the Ruger is metal and polymer as per the 5.56mm variant.
That said, you get what you pay for and whilst the Colt and S&W look like an AR15 pattern weapon in profile, they seem to have have few if any other parts in common; I can't find anyone who will confirm or deny how many aftermarket AR15 parts are directly interchangeable with those weapons. If these aftermarket parts (e.g. ambidextrous charging handle and safety) aren't interchangable then a trick has been missed.
In contrast, the Bradley appears to be effectively a 'real' all metal AR15 with bespoke .22 parts dropped in to the original upper and lower, and all other aftermarket parts should be compatable. It's physical appearance and hand made quality looks to be market-leading. Whether this makes it worth three times the price of the Colt or S&W is a matter of personal opinion if all you need is a tactical plinker which looks the part.
I think this rifle has a lot going for it (not least of all that if you leave the country you can change the bolt carrier and barrel and have a working 5.56mm rifle) however at the price I would really have liked to see a functioning forward assist and bolt hold-open.
Comment by: Alistair Posted on: 16 Mar 2010 at 10:23 PM
Yes as ever price and build quality are always major considerations; certainly in this area, as 22 rimfire military look-a-likes have become very popular in the last few years. Price aside the BAR has been the most accurate and reliable rifle of its type I have ever tested. However, the S&W M&P 15/22 scores with a fully functional last round hold open system and better price tag. What I'm looking forward to is the SIG 522, which I have great expectations of...
PM
Comment by: peter moore Posted on: 21 Mar 2010 at 11:21 AM
I looked carefully at all the available "tactical" 22lr's available and settled for the SIG 522. It's combination of great build, accuracy, almost unbelievable reliability with any ammunition, use of a none proprietary magazine and even it's eyewatering UK price (still way less than the Bradley tho'). I've had it for two weeks without having the opportunity to put a single round through it. And to add insult to injury my order of extra magazines and magpulls just arrived from the States. (UK £ price = 1 mag £35+ US$ price shipped £14). I really must get to the range and soon. I look forward to reading your review
Comment by: Jon Posted on: 23 Mar 2010 at 06:15 PM
Nice... could we see our own shorter range "two instead of three" gun competitions appearing in the UK? especially if you can just plonk this upper on an existing straight pull lower......
Comment by: D Brewer Posted on: 01 Apr 2010 at 10:29 AM
Good price on the mags...would love to know where you purchased them from?
I've also just gone for the Sig. I did a fair bit of research in to and including the Bradley arms after seeing one at Diggle ranges and have to say I was very impressed. However the Sig won out purley becasue of its working bolt catch and last round hold open. The M&P was far to light for me. Hopefully I can get some interest in Practical Shooting going at my local club.
Comment by: Sean Posted on: 12 Apr 2010 at 08:54 AM
Seems I was mislead by NWC when I asked him about the bolt catch function of the sig. Having shot the Sig a few times now I can defo say it does not function in the same way as its big brother etc with regards to the bolt catch . The last round hold open does work but it only works off the magazine as opposed to the bolt catch. Once you drop the mag out the action slides forward again, meaning you can not do a "tactical" mag change. You can either drop the mag out first, put a new mag in and then recharge/recock the gun. Or when the mag runs dry, pull the charging lever to the rear, manually lock it in with the bolt catch, drop out the mag, insert the new mag and release the bolt catch to send the working parts forward again. Both methods are time losers if you doing mag change in practical shooting disciplines. Needless to say I wont be buying anything from NWC again.
Comment by: Sean Posted on: 14 Apr 2010 at 11:36 PM
I bought a Spikes Tactical ST-22 M4 from NWCP and have really enjoyed shooting it down at my local range, I had forgotten how much fun shooting can be after spending years shooting prone rifle competitions.
As for the debate regarding the cost difference between the AR variants Spikes, Tac Solutions and Bradley Arms etc and the GSG-5 and 47 Alistair is quite correct, if you put my spikes alongside a GSG it makes the latter look like a toy, no offence to GSG owners but i'm afraid the old adage is correct "you get what you pay for"
One idea would be to kill 2 birds with one stone and buy a .223 straight pull AR15 and put a .22lr semi auto kit in it, the best of both worlds!
Comment by: John Posted on: 20 May 2010 at 08:58 PM
It does seem like the Bradley's accuracy is the best I have heard of from a semi auto .22, even those made by rimfire magic (which rate very highly) give an estimated accuracy of 1.5 inches at 100 yards for their custom rifles. If this M4 look a like can achieve 1 inch groups at 100 yards its pretty impressive.
Comment by: Dan Posted on: 06 Jun 2010 at 10:36 AM
Results speak for themselves and it is an accurate rifle no doubt...
Comment by: Pete Moore Posted on: 07 Jun 2010 at 08:12 AM